Advertisement
CNO vs PRU
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CNO Financial Group (CNO) vs. Prudential Financial (PRU) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CNO reported strong Q1 2026 results with 8.5% revenue growth and 33% higher operating earnings per share, driving shares near 52-week highs.
- PRU faces headwinds from an extended sales pause in Japan, potentially impacting $1 billion in earnings, contributing to softer recent momentum.
- CNO's one-year return stands at 22.32%, outperforming PRU's 2.11% amid broader insurance sector pressures.
- PRU offers a higher dividend yield of 5.53% compared to CNO's 1.52%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Both stocks exhibit low betas around 0.83-0.85, indicating similar stability relative to the market.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight trending bots with win rates up to 88% across various strategies, adaptable to insurance sector plays.
Introduction
This comparison examines CNO Financial Group and PRUdential Financial, two players in the insurance sector offering exposure to life, health, and annuity products. Investors seeking relative performance insights in a volatile market—particularly those focused on momentum, earnings stability, and dividend reliability—may find value here. With recent earnings cycles and sector-specific challenges influencing sentiment, understanding their business models, recent trajectories, and risk profiles aids informed decision-making in stock selection or portfolio allocation.
CNO Overview and Recent Performance
CNO Financial Group, Inc. is an insurance holding company specializing in health insurance, annuities, individual life insurance, and related financial services through brands like Bankers Life and Washington National. In recent market activity, shares have climbed toward 52-week highs around $44.94, trading near $44.63 with a market cap of approximately $4.19 billion and a P/E ratio of 17.43. Key drivers include robust Q1 2026 results, featuring 8.5% year-over-year revenue growth to $1.03 billion, operating earnings per share of $1.05 (up 33%), and new annualized premiums up 11%. Favorable expense ratios at 18.9% and ongoing share repurchases totaling $60 million have bolstered sentiment, with year-to-date gains of 5.52% and one-year returns of 22.32% reflecting consistent momentum.
PRU Overview and Recent Performance
PRUdential Financial, Inc. operates as a major provider of annuities, life insurance, retirement services, and asset management, serving individual and institutional clients globally. Shares have traded around $98.62, with a substantial market cap of $34.32 billion and a lower P/E ratio of 9.87, midway in their 52-week range of $91.89 to $119.76. Recent weeks have seen pressure from an extended 180-day sales pause in Japan, withdrawal of EPS guidance, and a warned $1 billion earnings hit, tempering outlook ahead of Q1 results. Despite year-to-date gains of 11.45%, one-year performance lags at 2.11%, influenced by international exposure and analyst revisions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots, each scanning thousands of tickers for real-time signals suited to current market conditions like volatility in sectors including finance and insurance. These bots showcase impressive stats: annualized returns from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, profit factors up to 11.70, and profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 17.02. Trading 3 to 18 tickers per bot across strategies like trend-following (1-49 day holds) and sector-specific plays (e.g., finance names like GS, HBAN), they offer diverse styles from short-term scalps to longer swings. Explore these vetted tools to align AI-driven insights with your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CNO and PRU operate in insurance but differ in scale and focus: CNO emphasizes U.S.-centric individual health and life products, while PRU has broader global reach including asset management and retirement services. Growth drivers for CNO include premium expansion and cost discipline, contrasting PRU's reliance on international markets now strained by Japan regulatory issues. Recent momentum favors CNO with superior one-year gains, though PRU leads YTD and offers higher dividends. Risk factors highlight PRU's greater international exposure versus CNO's domestic stability; low betas indicate comparable market sensitivity. Sentiment tilts toward CNO post-earnings, with PRU analysts cautious on near-term catalysts.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward CNO based on trend consistency from strong Q1 execution, premium growth, and proximity to highs, positioning it favorably against PRU's regulatory overhangs and earnings risks. While PRU provides scale and yield advantages, observable momentum and stability metrics suggest higher near-term probability for outperformance in CNO under prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a StrongBuy and PRU is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PRU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PRU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +6.44% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNO is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
PRU is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (+3.73% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| CNO | PRU | CNO / PRU | |
| Capitalization | 4.67B | 37B | 13% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.586 | -3.060 | -607% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.15 | 10.97 | 184% |
| Revenue | 4.51B | 63B | 7% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 83.5B | - |
| Total Debt | 4.3B | 23.1B | 19% |
CNO | PRU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 58 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRU's Valuation (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (58) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRU (59) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's SMR Rating (89) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.
CNO's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRU (83) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRU’s over the last 12 months.
| CNO | PRU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
CNO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with JXN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then JXN could also see price increases.