CNO
Price
$40.45
Change
+$0.68 (+1.71%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.86B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PRU
Price
$106.75
Change
+$2.63 (+2.53%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
37.35B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNO vs PRU

Header iconCNO vs PRU Comparison
Open Charts CNO vs PRUBanner chart's image
CNO Financial Group
Price$40.45
Change+$0.68 (+1.71%)
Volume$829.57K
Capitalization3.86B
Prudential Financial
Price$106.75
Change+$2.63 (+2.53%)
Volume$2.72M
Capitalization37.35B
CNO vs PRU Comparison Chart in %
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNO vs. PRU commentary
Nov 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNO is a Hold and PRU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CNO: $40.45 vs. PRU: $106.75)
Brand notoriety: CNO: Not notable vs. PRU: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNO: 123% vs. PRU: 165%
Market capitalization -- CNO: $3.86B vs. PRU: $37.35B
CNO [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.86B. PRU’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $37.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $152.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $25.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CNO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PRU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PRU is a better buy in the long-term than CNO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRU’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PRU’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PRU is a better buy in the short-term than CNO.

Price Growth

CNO (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while PRU (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNO is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

PRU is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-1.33% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRU($37.4B) has a higher market cap than CNO($3.86B). PRU has higher P/E ratio than CNO: PRU (14.62) vs CNO (13.85). CNO YTD gains are higher at: 10.112 vs. PRU (-5.262). CNO has less debt than PRU: CNO (4.13B) vs PRU (22.1B). PRU has higher revenues than CNO: PRU (57.9B) vs CNO (4.38B).
CNOPRUCNO / PRU
Capitalization3.86B37.4B10%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.112-5.262-192%
P/E Ratio13.8514.6295%
Revenue4.38B57.9B8%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt4.13B22.1B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNO vs PRU: Fundamental Ratings
CNO
PRU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1427
SMR RATING
1..100
9199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PRU's Valuation (20) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (55) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (27) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's SMR Rating (91) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

CNO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as PRU (55) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNO’s stock grew similarly to PRU’s over the last 12 months.

PRU's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNO (55) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry. This means that PRU’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOPRU
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PRU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UPRO105.383.00
+2.93%
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
CONL17.250.32
+1.89%
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
BAMG38.600.57
+1.49%
Brookstone Growth Stock ETF
BIDD27.620.30
+1.10%
iShares International Dividend ActiveETF
RNEM54.95N/A
N/A
First Trust Emerging Markets Eq Sel ETF

CNO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNO has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNO jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNO
1D Price
Change %
CNO100%
+1.71%
MET - CNO
81%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
PRU - CNO
81%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
JXN - CNO
79%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
LNC - CNO
79%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
PRI - CNO
78%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
More