CNOB
Price
$25.10
Change
-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
40 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$63.22
Change
-$0.25 (-0.39%)
Updated
Sep 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.36B
37 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOB vs HWC

Header iconCNOB vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs HWCBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$25.10
Change-$0.11 (-0.44%)
Volume$195.06K
Capitalization1.26B
Hancock Whitney
Price$63.22
Change-$0.25 (-0.39%)
Volume$763.98K
Capitalization5.36B
CNOB vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOB vs. HWC commentary
Sep 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a Hold and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOB: $25.10 vs. HWC: $63.22)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 65% vs. HWC: 101%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $1.26B vs. HWC: $5.36B
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.26B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than CNOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.88% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.33% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.36B) has a higher market cap than CNOB($1.26B). CNOB has higher P/E ratio than HWC: CNOB (30.61) vs HWC (11.66). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 18.310 vs. CNOB (11.942). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. CNOB (49.8M). HWC has less debt than CNOB: HWC (849M) vs CNOB (1.1B). HWC has higher revenues than CNOB: HWC (1.47B) vs CNOB (288M).
CNOBHWCCNOB / HWC
Capitalization1.26B5.36B24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.94218.31065%
P/E Ratio30.6111.66262%
Revenue288M1.47B20%
Total Cash49.8M513M10%
Total Debt1.1B849M129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6120
SMR RATING
1..100
2912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNOB (61). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (29). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (50). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (47). This means that CNOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRBCX213.100.70
+0.33%
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth
GGWPX13.350.01
+0.07%
Goldman Sachs Global Infras P
RREYX30.90-0.05
-0.16%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs Y
INSLX43.54-0.09
-0.21%
Invesco International Small-Mid Com R5
SMVFX11.86-0.10
-0.84%
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity C

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
-0.44%
STBA - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
BBT - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.07%
WSFS - CNOB
88%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
HWC - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
FCF - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.57%
More