CNOB
Price
$22.98
Change
+$0.21 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
748.88M
5 days until earnings call
WSBF
Price
$13.20
Change
+$0.18 (+1.38%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
239.73M
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNOB vs WSBF

Header iconCNOB vs WSBF Comparison
Open Charts CNOB vs WSBFBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$22.98
Change+$0.21 (+0.92%)
Volume$121.21K
Capitalization748.88M
Waterstone Financial
Price$13.20
Change+$0.18 (+1.38%)
Volume$62.9K
Capitalization239.73M
CNOB vs WSBF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOB vs. WSBF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOB is a Hold and WSBF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOB: $22.98 vs. WSBF: $13.20)
Brand notoriety: CNOB and WSBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOB: 64% vs. WSBF: 143%
Market capitalization -- CNOB: $748.88M vs. WSBF: $239.73M
CNOB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $748.88M. WSBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $239.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWSBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WSBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the long-term than WSBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNOB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNOB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WSBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNOB is a better buy in the short-term than WSBF.

Price Growth

CNOB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.83% price change this week, while WSBF (@Regional Banks) price change was +9.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

WSBF is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOB($749M) has a higher market cap than WSBF($240M). WSBF has higher P/E ratio than CNOB: WSBF (25.99) vs CNOB (9.21). CNOB YTD gains are higher at: 0.306 vs. WSBF (-0.614). CNOB has more cash in the bank: 61.4M vs. WSBF (53.4M). WSBF has less debt than CNOB: WSBF (464M) vs CNOB (1.03B). CNOB has higher revenues than WSBF: CNOB (269M) vs WSBF (128M).
CNOBWSBFCNOB / WSBF
Capitalization749M240M312%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.306-0.614-50%
P/E Ratio9.2125.9935%
Revenue269M128M210%
Total Cash61.4M53.4M115%
Total Debt1.03B464M221%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNOB vs WSBF: Fundamental Ratings
CNOB
WSBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
1860
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2189
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSBF's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (41). This means that WSBF’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSBF (100). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to WSBF’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSBF (60). This means that CNOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSBF’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSBF (62). This means that CNOB’s stock grew similarly to WSBF’s over the last 12 months.

CNOB's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for WSBF (89). This means that CNOB’s stock grew significantly faster than WSBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNOBWSBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
58%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FDFIX25.590.25
+0.99%
Fidelity Flex 500 Index
IDPSX55.760.46
+0.83%
ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Svc
GTILX27.860.22
+0.80%
Glenmede Quant US Large Cap Gr Eq Instl
FGIYX11.660.06
+0.52%
Nuveen Global Infrastructure I
MXMSX11.27N/A
N/A
Empower Small Cap Growth Instl

CNOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNOB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOB
1D Price
Change %
CNOB100%
+0.92%
UBSI - CNOB
87%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
TRST - CNOB
86%
Closely correlated
+0.50%
CTBI - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
TOWN - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
BUSE - CNOB
85%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More