BUSE
Price
$30.30
Change
+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNOB
Price
$32.27
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs CNOB

BUSE vs CNOB Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CNOB commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CNOB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $30.30 vs. CNOB: $32.27)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CNOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 46% vs. CNOB: 86%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.5B vs. CNOB: $1.62B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.5B. CNOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCNOB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CNOB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than CNOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNOB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNOB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than CNOB.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.98% price change this week, while CNOB (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

CNOB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.5B) has a higher market cap than CNOB($1.62B). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than CNOB: BUSE (12.36) vs CNOB (10.02). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 31.093 vs. CNOB (25.440). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. CNOB (39.5M). BUSE has less debt than CNOB: BUSE (506M) vs CNOB (1.06B). BUSE has higher revenues than CNOB: BUSE (791M) vs CNOB (461M).
BUSECNOBBUSE / CNOB
Capitalization2.5B1.62B154%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.09325.440122%
P/E Ratio12.3610.02123%
Revenue791M461M172%
Total Cash169M39.5M428%
Total Debt506M1.06B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CNOB: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CNOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4169
SMR RATING
1..100
3742
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (39). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (69). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (42). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (46). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CNOB (98). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CNOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECNOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNOB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYT87.030.76
+0.88%
iShares Transportation Average ETF
NMT12.480.01
+0.12%
Nuveen Massachusetts Quality Municipal Income Fund
KPHO22.31N/A
N/A
Kraneshares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF
SCD15.64-0.01
-0.06%
LMP Capital and Income Fund
UFIV47.92-0.06
-0.13%
F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with PRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then PRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.30%
PRK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
EFSC - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
TRMK - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
SHBI - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
FULT - BUSE
85%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
More