CNOBP
Price
$22.82
Change
-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SBNY
Price
$0.76
Change
-$0.01 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.15M
21 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNOBP vs SBNY

Header iconCNOBP vs SBNY Comparison
Open Charts CNOBP vs SBNYBanner chart's image
ConnectOne Ban
Price$22.82
Change-$0.05 (-0.22%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
Signature Bank (New York, NY)
Price$0.76
Change-$0.01 (-1.30%)
Volume$4.39K
Capitalization3.15M
CNOBP vs SBNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNOBP vs. SBNY commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNOBP is a StrongBuy and SBNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CNOBP: $22.87 vs. SBNY: $0.76)
Brand notoriety: CNOBP and SBNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNOBP: 4% vs. SBNY: 7%
Market capitalization -- CNOBP: $0 vs. SBNY: $3.15M
CNOBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. SBNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNOBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CNOBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBNY is a better buy in the long-term than CNOBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SBNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SBNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

CNOBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while SBNY (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBNY is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNOBP YTD gains are higher at: 2.495 vs. SBNY (-44.526). SBNY has more cash in the bank: 11.3B vs. CNOBP (61.4M). CNOBP has less debt than SBNY: CNOBP (1.03B) vs SBNY (2.31B). SBNY has higher revenues than CNOBP: SBNY (2.7B) vs CNOBP (269M).
CNOBPSBNYCNOBP / SBNY
CapitalizationN/A3.15M-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.495-44.526-6%
P/E RatioN/A0.00-
Revenue269M2.7B10%
Total Cash61.4M11.3B1%
Total Debt1.03B2.31B44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SBNY: Fundamental Ratings
SBNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
8
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SBNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SBNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVSYX25.590.13
+0.51%
Allspring Disciplined US Core Admin
GQSCX13.460.04
+0.30%
Glenmede Disciplined US Small Cap Eq Ptf
IGREX8.990.02
+0.22%
Invesco Global Real Estate R5
BUFBX20.990.01
+0.05%
Buffalo Flexible Allocation
ASVDX9.83-0.01
-0.10%
American Century Small Cap Value R6

CNOBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNOBP has been loosely correlated with MSBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNOBP jumps, then MSBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNOBP
1D Price
Change %
CNOBP100%
N/A
MSBI - CNOBP
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
ONBPO - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AFBI - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
ESQ - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
SBNY - CNOBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
More

SBNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBNY has been closely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBNY jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBNY
1D Price
Change %
SBNY100%
-1.94%
WAL - SBNY
84%
Closely correlated
N/A
FITB - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
SNV - SBNY
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
OZK - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
BKU - SBNY
73%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More