CNP
Price
$38.12
Change
-$0.32 (-0.83%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
24.89B
74 days until earnings call
IESFY
Price
$143.39
Change
+$8.33 (+6.17%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNP vs IESFY

Header iconCNP vs IESFY Comparison
Open Charts CNP vs IESFYBanner chart's image
CenterPoint Energy
Price$38.12
Change-$0.32 (-0.83%)
Volume$4.99M
Capitalization24.89B
Interconexion Electrica S.A. E.S.P. - ISA
Price$143.39
Change+$8.33 (+6.17%)
Volume$5
Capitalization6.22B
CNP vs IESFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IESFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNP vs. IESFY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNP is a Hold and IESFY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CNP: $38.12 vs. IESFY: $143.39)
Brand notoriety: CNP and IESFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNP: 102% vs. IESFY: 55%
Market capitalization -- CNP: $24.89B vs. IESFY: $6.22B
CNP [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $24.89B. IESFY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $6.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $155.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIESFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IESFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IESFY is a better buy in the long-term than CNP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IESFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IESFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNP is a better buy in the short-term than IESFY.

Price Growth

CNP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while IESFY (@Electric Utilities) price change was +15.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.29% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNP($24.9B) has a higher market cap than IESFY($6.22B). CNP has higher P/E ratio than IESFY: CNP (26.66) vs IESFY (9.87). IESFY YTD gains are higher at: 61.485 vs. CNP (21.651). IESFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.66T vs. CNP (3.43B). IESFY has more cash in the bank: 7.2T vs. CNP (776M). IESFY has higher revenues than CNP: IESFY (16.34T) vs CNP (8.98B).
CNPIESFYCNP / IESFY
Capitalization24.9B6.22B401%
EBITDA3.43B9.66T0%
Gain YTD21.65161.48535%
P/E Ratio26.669.87270%
Revenue8.98B16.34T0%
Total Cash776M7.2T0%
Total Debt21.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNP vs IESFY: Fundamental Ratings
CNP
IESFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
762
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
970
SMR RATING
1..100
7328
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1236
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5015

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IESFY's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CNP (73) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IESFY’s stock grew similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Electric Utilities industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IESFY (70) in the null industry. This means that CNP’s stock grew somewhat faster than IESFY’s over the last 12 months.

IESFY's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNP (73) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that IESFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNP’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as IESFY (42) in the null industry. This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to IESFY’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as IESFY (36) in the null industry. This means that CNP’s stock grew similarly to IESFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNPIESFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IESFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWJD34.950.08
+0.23%
Inspire International ETF
EEMO17.60N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Mom ETF
JIII50.85-0.01
-0.02%
Janus Henderson Income ETF
NLR115.76-0.20
-0.17%
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
RZG52.51-0.32
-0.61%
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Gr ETF

CNP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNP has been closely correlated with BKH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNP jumps, then BKH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNP
1D Price
Change %
CNP100%
-0.83%
BKH - CNP
70%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
PPL - CNP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
EVRG - CNP
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.18%
DTE - CNP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
OGE - CNP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
More

IESFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IESFY and CNP have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IESFY and CNP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IESFY
1D Price
Change %
IESFY100%
N/A
CNP - IESFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
HRNNF - IESFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKVTY - IESFY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HPIFY - IESFY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKCVF - IESFY
-9%
Poorly correlated
N/A