Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs MLNSX
CNPAX vs MLNSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MLNSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.32B
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr R6
Price$24.19
Change+$0.12 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.1M
CNPAX vs MLNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MLNSX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MLNSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. MLNSX (274M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MLNSX: CNPAX (0.54) vs MLNSX (0.24). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MLNSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs MLNSX (9 years). MLNSX (19.78) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). MLNSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLNSX: CNPAX (250) vs MLNSX (5000000). MLNSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. CNPAX (5.29). MLNSX return over 5 years is better than : 102.07 vs. CNPAX (47.64).
| CNPAX | MLNSX | CNPAX / MLNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.95 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 19.78 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | 3.068 | 75% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 274M | 51,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.24 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 13.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | 64.64 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | 102.07 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...