Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs MWOFX
CNPAX vs MWOFX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs MWOFX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$73.05
Change+$0.15 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.14B
MFS Global Growth A
Price$65.90
Change+$0.31 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets939.48M
CNPAX vs MWOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. MWOFX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and MWOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. MWOFX (939M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than MWOFX: CNPAX (0.46) vs MWOFX (0.01). CNPAX was incepted earlier than MWOFX: CNPAX (24 years) vs MWOFX (32 years). MWOFX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX (24.00) and MWOFX (23.00) have comparable annual turnover. MWOFX initial investment is less costly to investors than CNPAX (4%) vs CNPAX (4%). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MWOFX: CNPAX (250) vs MWOFX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.59 vs. MWOFX (-0.61). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.62 vs. MWOFX (26.27).
| CNPAX | MWOFX | CNPAX / MWOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.22 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.695 | 6.981 | 282% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 939M | 17,465% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.01 | 8,022% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.59 | -0.61 | -2,384% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.42 | 33.94 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.62 | 26.27 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 112.34 | 101.41 | 111% |