Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NBFCX
CNPAX vs NBFCX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NBFCX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$72.81
Change-$0.41 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.4B
Neuberger Berman Focus Trust
Price$36.42
Change-$0.17 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.43M
CNPAX vs NBFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NBFCX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and NBFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 164B vs. NBFCX (830M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NBFCX: CNPAX (0.46) vs NBFCX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NBFCX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NBFCX (32 years). NBFCX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NBFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). NBFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: NBFCX (0) vs CNPAX (250). NBFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.91 vs. CNPAX (13.83). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.19 vs. NBFCX (26.66).
| CNPAX | NBFCX | CNPAX / NBFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.11 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.11 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.302 | 21.119 | 91% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164B | 830M | 19,759% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.46 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.83 | 22.91 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.53 | 90.12 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.19 | 26.66 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.57 | 22.69 | 479% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement