Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs NFACX
CNPAX vs NFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs NFACX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.75
Change-$0.07 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.12B
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$33.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets806.28M
CNPAX vs NFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. NFACX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and NFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. NFACX (806M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than NFACX: CNPAX (0.48) vs NFACX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than NFACX: CNPAX (24 years) vs NFACX (15 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: CNPAX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.77 vs. CNPAX (14.96). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.83 vs. NFACX (23.73).
| CNPAX | NFACX | CNPAX / NFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.87 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.96 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.565 | 18.115 | 97% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 806M | 19,851% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.96 | 21.77 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.60 | 68.11 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.83 | 23.73 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.79 | -35.48 | -307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement