Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs OWLSX
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.16
Change-$0.63 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$22.47
Change-$0.22 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.73B
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. OWLSX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and OWLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. OWLSX (25.7B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPAX (0.45) vs OWLSX (0.35). CNPAX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPAX (24 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPAX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. OWLSX (8.39). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. CNPAX (27.74).
| CNPAX | OWLSX | CNPAX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.598 | 14.423 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 25.7B | 623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.35 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 8.39 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 53.96 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.74 | 39.87 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.04 | 81.97 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement