Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs OWLSX
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$69.28
Change+$0.54 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.4B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$21.81
Change+$0.15 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.19B
CNPAX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. OWLSX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and OWLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 155B vs. OWLSX (25.2B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPAX (0.48) vs OWLSX (0.38). CNPAX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPAX (23 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPAX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.56 vs. OWLSX (14.95). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. CNPAX (38.09).
| CNPAX | OWLSX | CNPAX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.518 | 9.228 | 146% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155B | 25.2B | 615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.38 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.56 | 14.95 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.15 | 42.96 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.09 | 45.21 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.75 | 72.27 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement