Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs PGIIX
CNPAX vs PGIIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PGIIX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$64.50
Change+$0.52 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets145.83B
Polen Global Growth Institutional
Price$26.67
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.13M
CNPAX vs PGIIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PGIIX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and PGIIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 146B vs. PGIIX (365M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PGIIX: CNPAX (0.54) vs PGIIX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PGIIX: CNPAX (23 years) vs PGIIX (10 years). PGIIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). CNPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PGIIX (21.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGIIX: CNPAX (250) vs PGIIX (100000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. PGIIX (3.63). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 55.80 vs. PGIIX (44.77).
| CNPAX | PGIIX | CNPAX / PGIIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.98 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.98 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.686 | 0.075 | 7,543% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 146B | 365M | 40,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 3.63 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.60 | 29.77 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.80 | 44.77 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.89 | 152.12 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...