Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPAX vs PRJBX
CNPAX vs PRJBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs PRJBX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$71.16
Change-$0.63 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities R2
Price$46.43
Change-$0.53 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
CNPAX vs PRJBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. PRJBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Hold and PRJBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. PRJBX (6.07B). CNPAX pays higher dividends than PRJBX: CNPAX (0.45) vs PRJBX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than PRJBX: CNPAX (24 years) vs PRJBX (7 years). PRJBX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). PRJBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). PRJBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPAX: PRJBX (0) vs CNPAX (250). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.12 vs. PRJBX (0.66). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.74 vs. PRJBX (10.05).
| CNPAX | PRJBX | CNPAX / PRJBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.36 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.598 | 5.268 | 315% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 6.07B | 2,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.12 | 0.66 | 1,824% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.23 | 65.59 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.74 | 10.05 | 276% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.04 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers