Ad is loading...
CNPAX vs RGCEX
CNPAX vs RGCEX Comparison
Open Charts CNPAX vs RGCEX
American Funds New Perspective 529A
Price$62.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.07B
Columbia Select Global Equity C
Price$15.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets699.98M
CNPAX vs RGCEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPAX vs. RGCEX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPAX is a Buy and RGCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPAX has more cash in the bank: 142B vs. RGCEX (700M). CNPAX pays higher dividends than RGCEX: CNPAX (0.54) vs RGCEX (0.00). CNPAX was incepted earlier than RGCEX: CNPAX (23 years) vs RGCEX (25 years). RGCEX (1.99) is less costly to investors than CNPAX (0.77). RGCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CNPAX (24.00). CNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGCEX: CNPAX (250) vs RGCEX (2000). CNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.29 vs. RGCEX (-1.17). CNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. RGCEX (19.97).
| CNPAX | RGCEX | CNPAX / RGCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.97 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.99 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.294 | 1.328 | 173% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 142B | 700M | 20,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | -1.17 | -454% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.34 | 25.60 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | 19.97 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.72 | 67.51 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...