Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSGGX
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSGGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.49B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$23.75
Change+$0.05 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.32M
CNPFX vs LSGGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSGGX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSGGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSGGX (132M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: CNPFX (0.65) vs LSGGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSGGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSGGX (9 years). LSGGX (1.13) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.61 vs. CNPFX (11.76). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 45.04 vs. CNPFX (42.78).
| CNPFX | LSGGX | CNPFX / LSGGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.95 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.311 | 13.235 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 132M | 118,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 24.61 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.12 | 73.50 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.78 | 45.04 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.09 | N/A | - |