Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSNGX
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$72.37
Change+$0.14 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.58B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$25.43
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.7M
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSNGX (137M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPFX (0.62) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSNGX (9 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.63 vs. CNPFX (12.64). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.17 vs. CNPFX (36.67).
| CNPFX | LSNGX | CNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.995 | 21.201 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 163B | 137M | 118,978% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.64 | 25.63 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.93 | 98.59 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.67 | 40.17 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement