Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs LSNGX
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs LSNGX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$68.61
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$23.77
Change+$0.17 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets130.75M
CNPFX vs LSNGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. LSNGX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and LSNGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. LSNGX (131M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: CNPFX (0.65) vs LSNGX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than LSNGX: CNPFX (23 years) vs LSNGX (8 years). LSNGX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). CNPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: CNPFX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.35 vs. CNPFX (11.32). LSNGX (48.75) and CNPFX (47.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | LSNGX | CNPFX / LSNGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.90 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.06 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.031 | 13.244 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 131M | 119,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 23.35 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.79 | 76.86 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.85 | 48.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement