Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGLBX
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$71.08
Change-$0.67 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.17B
Marsico Global
Price$32.46
Change-$0.27 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets466.66M
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 162B vs. MGLBX (467M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPFX (0.64) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPFX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.21 vs. CNPFX (11.68). MGLBX return over 5 years is better than : 46.64 vs. CNPFX (41.87).
| CNPFX | MGLBX | CNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.100 | 27.952 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162B | 467M | 34,690% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | 29.21 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.69 | 130.33 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.87 | 46.64 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.61 | 168.06 | 73% |