Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs MGLBX
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs MGLBX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.85
Change-$0.47 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
Marsico Global
Price$31.30
Change-$0.33 (-1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets470.31M
CNPFX vs MGLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. MGLBX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and MGLBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. MGLBX (470M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than MGLBX: CNPFX (0.65) vs MGLBX (0.00). CNPFX was incepted earlier than MGLBX: CNPFX (23 years) vs MGLBX (18 years). MGLBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). MGLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGLBX: CNPFX (250) vs MGLBX (2500). MGLBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.74 vs. CNPFX (11.89). MGLBX (33.46) and CNPFX (32.48) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CNPFX | MGLBX | CNPFX / MGLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.44 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.074 | 23.651 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 470M | 33,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 29.74 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.93 | 105.66 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 33.46 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.74 | 152.23 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement