Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs OWLSX
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$69.85
Change-$0.47 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.54B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$22.16
Change-$0.11 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.69B
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. OWLSX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and OWLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. OWLSX (25.7B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPFX (0.65) vs OWLSX (0.38). CNPFX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPFX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.89 vs. OWLSX (10.10). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 42.64 vs. CNPFX (32.48).
| CNPFX | OWLSX | CNPFX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.074 | 12.305 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159B | 25.7B | 619% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 0.38 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 10.10 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.93 | 52.33 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.48 | 42.64 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.74 | 94.45 | 121% |