Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs OWLSX
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs OWLSX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$70.88
Change-$0.62 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.3B
Old Westbury Large Cap Strategies
Price$22.47
Change-$0.22 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.73B
CNPFX vs OWLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. OWLSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Hold and OWLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 160B vs. OWLSX (25.7B). CNPFX pays higher dividends than OWLSX: CNPFX (0.61) vs OWLSX (0.35). CNPFX was incepted earlier than OWLSX: CNPFX (23 years) vs OWLSX (32 years). OWLSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than CNPFX (0.84). OWLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than OWLSX: CNPFX (250) vs OWLSX (1000). CNPFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.29 vs. OWLSX (8.39). OWLSX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. CNPFX (28.73).
| CNPFX | OWLSX | CNPFX / OWLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.771 | 14.423 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 160B | 25.7B | 623% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 0.35 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.29 | 8.39 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.93 | 53.96 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.73 | 39.87 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.69 | 81.97 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers