Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPFX vs ZGFIX
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison
Open Charts CNPFX vs ZGFIX
American Funds New Perspective 529F
Price$65.75
Change-$0.25 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets150.13B
American Beacon Ninety One Gbl Frnchs R5
Price$19.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets431.41M
CNPFX vs ZGFIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPFX vs. ZGFIX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPFX is a Buy and ZGFIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNPFX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. ZGFIX (431M). CNPFX pays higher dividends than ZGFIX: CNPFX (0.68) vs ZGFIX (0.21). CNPFX was incepted earlier than ZGFIX: CNPFX (23 years) vs ZGFIX (7 years). ZGFIX (0.87) and CNPFX (0.84) have similar cost to investors . ZGFIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. CNPFX (24.00). CNPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZGFIX: CNPFX (250) vs ZGFIX (250000). ZGFIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.97 vs. CNPFX (9.32). ZGFIX return over 5 years is better than : 57.27 vs. CNPFX (45.49).
| CNPFX | ZGFIX | CNPFX / ZGFIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.85 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.87 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.731 | 11.761 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 431M | 34,803% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.21 | 329% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 15.97 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.64 | 38.17 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.49 | 57.27 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement