Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPIX vs RMQHX
CNPIX vs RMQHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPIX vs. RMQHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPIX is a Hold and RMQHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 467M vs. CNPIX (3.46M). CNPIX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: CNPIX (1.66) vs RMQHX (0.18). CNPIX was incepted earlier than RMQHX: CNPIX (22 years) vs RMQHX (11 years). CNPIX (2.54) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.80). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1036.00 vs. CNPIX (551.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPIX: RMQHX (2500) vs CNPIX (15000). RMQHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. CNPIX (-8.52). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 111.48 vs. CNPIX (-1.38).
| CNPIX | RMQHX | CNPIX / RMQHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.27 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.80 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.615 | 29.770 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.46M | 467M | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 0.18 | 912% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.52 | 9.15 | -93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.93 | 173.58 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.38 | 111.48 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.60 | 1032.38 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement