Ad is loading...
CNPIX vs RMQHX
CNPIX vs RMQHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPIX vs. RMQHX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPIX is a Buy and RMQHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 688M vs. CNPIX (3.64M). CNPIX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: CNPIX (1.48) vs RMQHX (0.28). CNPIX was incepted earlier than RMQHX: CNPIX (21 years) vs RMQHX (10 years). CNPIX (2.54) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.95). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. CNPIX (173.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPIX: RMQHX (2500) vs CNPIX (15000). CNPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.79 vs. RMQHX (-24.87). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 144.20 vs. CNPIX (66.83).
| CNPIX | RMQHX | CNPIX / RMQHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.43 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 1.95 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.406 | -25.734 | -2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.64M | 688M | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 0.28 | 523% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.79 | -24.87 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.60 | 1.74 | -952% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.83 | 144.20 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.75 | 642.32 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...