CNPOF vs CRLBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPOF is a StrongSell and CRLBF is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNPOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRLBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNPOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CRLBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNPOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRLBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNPOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- CRLBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CNPOF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +1.39% price change this week, while CRLBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +8.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.43%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRLBF is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+8.21% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| CNPOF | CRLBF | CNPOF / CRLBF | |
| Capitalization | 13.3M | 501M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -163.44M | -16.73M | 977% |
| Gain YTD | 75.467 | 17.901 | 422% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.81M | 822M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 97.9M | 88.8M | 110% |
| Total Debt | 110M | 678M | 16% |
CNPOF | CRLBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNPOF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRLBF (80). This means that CNPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRLBF’s over the last 12 months.
CNPOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLBF (100). This means that CNPOF’s stock grew similarly to CRLBF’s over the last 12 months.
CRLBF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CNPOF (98). This means that CRLBF’s stock grew similarly to CNPOF’s over the last 12 months.
CNPOF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRLBF (79). This means that CNPOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRLBF’s over the last 12 months.
CNPOF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLBF (100). This means that CNPOF’s stock grew similarly to CRLBF’s over the last 12 months.
| CNPOF | CRLBF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 24 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | N/A |
CNPOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNPOF and CBSTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNPOF and CBSTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNPOF | 100% | +4.37% | ||
| CBSTF - CNPOF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.29% | ||
| GLASF - CNPOF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| JUSHF - CNPOF | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CRLBF - CNPOF | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| CPHRF - CNPOF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.68% | ||
More | ||||
CRLBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLBF has been closely correlated with TCNNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLBF jumps, then TCNNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRLBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRLBF | 100% | +1.82% | ||
| TCNNF - CRLBF | 75% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| TSNDF - CRLBF | 75% Closely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| JUSHF - CRLBF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CURLF - CRLBF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| VRNOF - CRLBF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.98% | ||
More | ||||