Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNPSX vs RMQHX
CNPSX vs RMQHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNPSX vs. RMQHX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNPSX is a Buy and RMQHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMQHX has more cash in the bank: 749M vs. CNPSX (3.65M). CNPSX pays higher dividends than RMQHX: CNPSX (0.64) vs RMQHX (0.28). CNPSX was incepted earlier than RMQHX: CNPSX (21 years) vs RMQHX (10 years). CNPSX (3.54) is less costly to investors than RMQHX (1.95). RMQHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 334.00 vs. CNPSX (173.00). RMQHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNPSX: RMQHX (2500) vs CNPSX (15000). CNPSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.29 vs. RMQHX (-4.54). RMQHX return over 5 years is better than : 148.86 vs. CNPSX (56.01).
| CNPSX | RMQHX | CNPSX / RMQHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.78 | 1.43 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.54 | 1.95 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.606 | -2.790 | -129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 2500 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.65M | 749M | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.28 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | -4.54 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.70 | 83.63 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.01 | 148.86 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.29 | 816.07 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement