CNQ
Price
$31.12
Change
+$0.32 (+1.04%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
81.73B
40 days until earnings call
GFR
Price
$6.90
Change
-$0.13 (-1.85%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
411.56M
Ad is loading...

CNQ vs GFR

Header iconCNQ vs GFR Comparison
Open Charts CNQ vs GFRBanner chart's image
Canadian Natural Resources
Price$31.12
Change+$0.32 (+1.04%)
Volume$5.82M
Capitalization81.73B
Greenfire Resources
Price$6.90
Change-$0.13 (-1.85%)
Volume$35.31K
Capitalization411.56M
CNQ vs GFR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNQ vs. GFR commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNQ is a Hold and GFR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CNQ: $31.12 vs. GFR: $6.90)
Brand notoriety: CNQ: Notable vs. GFR: Not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNQ: 119% vs. GFR: 35%
Market capitalization -- CNQ: $81.73B vs. GFR: $411.56M
CNQ [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $81.73B. GFR’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $411.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGFR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CNQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the long-term than GFR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GFR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GFR is a better buy in the short-term than CNQ.

Price Growth

CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.95% price change this week, while GFR (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNQ is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

GFR is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.24% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($81.7B) has a higher market cap than GFR($412M). CNQ has higher P/E ratio than GFR: CNQ (13.95) vs GFR (4.21). CNQ YTD gains are higher at: 0.810 vs. GFR (-2.266). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.3B vs. GFR (60.9M). CNQ has more cash in the bank: 1.4B vs. GFR (110M). GFR has less debt than CNQ: GFR (390M) vs CNQ (10.8B). CNQ has higher revenues than GFR: CNQ (40.8B) vs GFR (676M).
CNQGFRCNQ / GFR
Capitalization81.7B412M19,830%
EBITDA17.3B60.9M28,407%
Gain YTD0.810-2.266-36%
P/E Ratio13.954.21331%
Revenue40.8B676M6,036%
Total Cash1.4B110M1,275%
Total Debt10.8B390M2,769%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNQ: Fundamental Ratings
CNQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
18
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNQGFR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
74%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWG10.210.08
+0.79%
NatWest Group plc
EMKR3.000.02
+0.67%
EMCORE Corp
CIM14.300.03
+0.21%
Chimera Investment Corp
SMG70.23-0.62
-0.88%
Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (The)
NOTV4.27-0.05
-1.16%
Inotiv

GFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFR has been loosely correlated with MUR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFR jumps, then MUR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFR
1D Price
Change %
GFR100%
-1.85%
MUR - GFR
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
DVN - GFR
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
CNQ - GFR
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
OBE - GFR
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
VET - GFR
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
More