It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVET’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VET’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.70% price change this week, while VET (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +47.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.12%.
CNQ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
VET is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2025.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
CNQ | VET | CNQ / VET | |
Capitalization | 81.7B | 2.01B | 4,057% |
EBITDA | 17.3B | 520M | 3,327% |
Gain YTD | -6.563 | -25.290 | 26% |
P/E Ratio | 13.95 | 2.80 | 498% |
Revenue | 40.8B | 2.2B | 1,855% |
Total Cash | 1.4B | 141M | 994% |
Total Debt | 10.8B | 947M | 1,140% |
CNQ | VET | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 36 Fair valued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 38 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VET's Valuation (32) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (36). This means that VET’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for VET (100). This means that CNQ’s stock grew significantly faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's SMR Rating (48) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VET (95). This means that CNQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than VET’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ's Price Growth Rating (74) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as VET (78). This means that CNQ’s stock grew similarly to VET’s over the last 12 months.
VET's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (57). This means that VET’s stock grew similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.
CNQ | VET | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago64% | 2 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago69% | 20 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNQ has been closely correlated with MEGEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNQ jumps, then MEGEF could also see price increases.