Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRUX vs GFACX
CNRUX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRUX vs GFACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Instl
Price$3.07
Change+$0.03 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.5M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.45
Change+$0.55 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.42B
CNRUX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRUX vs. GFACX commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRUX is a Hold and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 322B vs. CNRUX (374M). CNRUX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CNRUX (0.33) vs GFACX (0.00). CNRUX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CNRUX (13 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CNRUX (0.57). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRUX (20.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNRUX: GFACX (250) vs CNRUX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. CNRUX (-89.54). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.59 vs. CNRUX (-85.71).
| CNRUX | GFACX | CNRUX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.36 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.36 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -87.536 | 13.629 | -642% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 322B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -89.54 | 3.21 | -2,794% |
| Returns for 3 years | -86.69 | 53.59 | -162% |
| Returns for 5 years | -85.71 | 23.59 | -363% |
| Returns for 10 years | -76.44 | 68.21 | -112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement