Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRUX vs RGACX
CNRUX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRUX vs RGACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq Instl
Price$27.93
Change+$0.22 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.36M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$86.32
Change+$0.59 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
CNRUX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRUX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRUX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. CNRUX (384M). CNRUX pays higher dividends than RGACX: CNRUX (0.34) vs RGACX (0.07). CNRUX was incepted earlier than RGACX: CNRUX (13 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNRUX (0.57). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRUX (20.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNRUX: RGACX (250) vs CNRUX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.74 vs. CNRUX (-1.68). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. CNRUX (33.54).
| CNRUX | RGACX | CNRUX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.94 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.509 | 19.906 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.07 | 484% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.68 | 13.74 | -12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.26 | 67.77 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.54 | 41.40 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.05 | 96.68 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement