Ad is loading...
CNRWX vs GFACX
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRWX vs GFACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
Price$22.34
Change-$0.96 (-4.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.83M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRWX vs. GFACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRWX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. CNRWX (355M). CNRWX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CNRWX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). CNRWX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CNRWX (12 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CNRWX (1.07). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRWX (20.00). CNRWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CNRWX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. CNRWX (-8.11). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. CNRWX (50.27).
| CNRWX | GFACX | CNRWX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.400 | -5.003 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 280B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | -1.75 | 463% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.21 | 0.63 | -1,459% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.27 | 59.73 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.04 | 44.46 | 176% |