Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNRWX vs GFACX
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CNRWX vs GFACX
City National Rochdale US Cor Eq N
Price$25.43
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets369.07M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
CNRWX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNRWX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNRWX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. CNRWX (369M). CNRWX pays higher dividends than GFACX: CNRWX (0.05) vs GFACX (0.00). CNRWX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CNRWX (13 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CNRWX (1.07). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CNRWX (20.00). CNRWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CNRWX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. CNRWX (-9.04). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. CNRWX (31.48).
| CNRWX | GFACX | CNRWX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.07 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.395 | 11.292 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 369M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.04 | 7.11 | -127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.57 | 52.01 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.48 | 35.91 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.17 | 63.31 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement