CNS
Price
$77.49
Change
-$0.97 (-1.24%)
Updated
May 5, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.7B
72 days until earnings call
IVZ
Price
$14.41
Change
+$0.49 (+3.52%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
7.41B
85 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CNS vs IVZ

Header iconCNS vs IVZ Comparison
Open Charts CNS vs IVZBanner chart's image
Cohen & Steers
Price$77.49
Change-$0.97 (-1.24%)
Volume$397
Capitalization3.7B
Inves
Price$14.41
Change+$0.49 (+3.52%)
Volume$4.37M
Capitalization7.41B
CNS vs IVZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNS vs. IVZ commentary
May 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a StrongBuy and IVZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CNS: $78.46 vs. IVZ: $14.41)
Brand notoriety: CNS and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNS: 66% vs. IVZ: 68%
Market capitalization -- CNS: $3.7B vs. IVZ: $7.41B
CNS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.7B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $7.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CNS and IVZ are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNS is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.97% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNS is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.48% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IVZ($7.41B) has a higher market cap than CNS($3.7B). CNS has higher P/E ratio than IVZ: CNS (28.73) vs IVZ (12.27). CNS YTD gains are higher at: -14.424 vs. IVZ (-16.635). IVZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. CNS (184M). IVZ has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. CNS (265M). CNS has less debt than IVZ: CNS (140M) vs IVZ (9.05B). IVZ has higher revenues than CNS: IVZ (5.72B) vs CNS (490M).
CNSIVZCNS / IVZ
Capitalization3.7B7.41B50%
EBITDA184M1.13B16%
Gain YTD-14.424-16.63587%
P/E Ratio28.7312.27234%
Revenue490M5.72B9%
Total Cash265M1.93B14%
Total Debt140M9.05B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNS vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
CNS
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3758
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5963
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5883
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (73). This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (58). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's SMR Rating (100) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (100). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (63). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

CNS's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (83). This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNSIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CNS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIE19.020.71
+3.87%
Invesco DW Emerging Markets Momt ETF
OVF25.750.50
+1.96%
Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF
IOO98.301.28
+1.32%
iShares Global 100 ETF
BSJT20.990.08
+0.38%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 HY Corp Bd ETF
PCN12.880.03
+0.23%
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with JHG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then JHG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
+3.52%
JHG - IVZ
84%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
AMG - IVZ
80%
Closely correlated
+5.11%
BN - IVZ
79%
Closely correlated
+2.59%
KKR - IVZ
76%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
BX - IVZ
75%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
More