CG
Price
$47.16
Change
+$1.13 (+2.46%)
Updated
Aug 3, 11:40 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.57B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IVZ
Price
$29.60
Change
+$0.18 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
13.07B
85 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CG vs IVZ

CG vs IVZ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CG vs. IVZ commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CG is a StrongBuy and IVZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CG: $46.02 vs. IVZ: $29.60)
Brand notoriety: CG and IVZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CG: 45% vs. IVZ: 88%
Market capitalization -- CG: $16.57B vs. IVZ: $13.07B
CG [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.57B. IVZ’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $13.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $169.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIVZ’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IVZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IVZ is a better buy in the long-term than CG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CG’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVZ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CG’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • IVZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CG is a better buy in the short-term than IVZ.

Price Growth

CG (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.37% price change this week, while IVZ (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

CG is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

IVZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.15% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CG($16.6B) has a higher market cap than IVZ($13.1B). CG has higher P/E ratio than IVZ: CG (31.52) vs IVZ (19.48). IVZ YTD gains are higher at: 14.473 vs. CG (-21.066). IVZ has less debt than CG: IVZ (9.44B) vs CG (14.6B). IVZ has higher revenues than CG: IVZ (6.59B) vs CG (2.9B).
CGIVZCG / IVZ
Capitalization16.6B13.1B127%
EBITDAN/A1.5B-
Gain YTD-21.06614.473-146%
P/E Ratio31.5219.48162%
Revenue2.9B6.59B44%
Total CashN/A1.71B-
Total Debt14.6B9.44B155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CG vs IVZ: Fundamental Ratings
CG
IVZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4340
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8557
SMR RATING
1..100
7194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5914
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1732
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVZ's Valuation (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (14). This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as CG (85). This means that IVZ’s stock grew similarly to CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's SMR Rating (71) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (94). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

IVZ's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CG (59). This means that IVZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CG’s over the last 12 months.

CG's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as IVZ (32). This means that CG’s stock grew similarly to IVZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CGIVZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IVZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTHS28.662.41
+9.18%
Pelthos Therapeutics Inc
WIT1.980.03
+1.54%
Wipro Limited
NPB17.500.22
+1.27%
Northpointe Bancshares Inc
TRMD30.310.07
+0.23%
TORM plc
MBIO0.57-0.02
-3.36%
Mustang Bio Inc

IVZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVZ has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVZ jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVZ
1D Price
Change %
IVZ100%
+0.61%
BLK - IVZ
71%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
BEN - IVZ
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
STT - IVZ
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
CG - IVZ
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
BAM - IVZ
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
More