Advertisement
CNS vs THRM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNS is a Hold and THRM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTHRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CNS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- THRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while THRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- THRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNS (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.57% price change this week, while THRM (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.49% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.31%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -3.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNS is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
THRM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.07% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Auto Parts: OEM (-3.86% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| CNS | THRM | CNS / THRM | |
| Capitalization | 3.7B | 1.82B | 204% |
| EBITDA | 184M | 121M | 152% |
| Gain YTD | -19.145 | -19.724 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 28.73 | 45.95 | 63% |
| Revenue | 490M | 1.47B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 265M | 150M | 177% |
| Total Debt | 140M | 247M | 57% |
CNS | THRM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 27 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNS's Valuation (34) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as THRM (61) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to THRM’s over the last 12 months.
CNS's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as THRM (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew similarly to THRM’s over the last 12 months.
CNS's SMR Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for THRM (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CNS’s stock grew somewhat faster than THRM’s over the last 12 months.
THRM's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CNS (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that THRM’s stock grew similarly to CNS’s over the last 12 months.
THRM's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNS (84) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that THRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNS’s over the last 12 months.
| CNS | THRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
THRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, THRM has been closely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if THRM jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To THRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THRM | 100% | -1.66% | ||
| BWA - THRM | 72% Closely correlated | +6.57% | ||
| LEA - THRM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| MGA - THRM | 66% Closely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| ADNT - THRM | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| VC - THRM | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.50% | ||
More | ||||