Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNSIX vs MCOAX
CNSIX vs MCOAX Comparison
Open Charts CNSIX vs MCOAX
Invesco Convertible Securities R5
Price$24.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets702.69M
NYLI MacKay Convertible
Price$19.54
Change-$0.08 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.54B
CNSIX vs MCOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNSIX vs. MCOAX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSIX is a Buy and MCOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCOAX has more cash in the bank: 1.54B vs. CNSIX (703M). MCOAX pays higher dividends than CNSIX: MCOAX (3.07) vs CNSIX (2.45). CNSIX was incepted earlier than MCOAX: CNSIX (14 years) vs MCOAX (30 years). MCOAX (0.94) is less costly to investors than CNSIX (0.68). CNSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. MCOAX (35.00). MCOAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNSIX: MCOAX (15000) vs CNSIX (1000000). CNSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. MCOAX (9.48). MCOAX return over 5 years is better than : 12.89 vs. CNSIX (0.76).
| CNSIX | MCOAX | CNSIX / MCOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.94 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.94 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.327 | 5.549 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 15000 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 25000 | - |
| Net Assets | 703M | 1.54B | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.45 | 3.07 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.66 | 9.48 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.77 | 21.77 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.76 | 12.89 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.35 | 32.04 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers