Ad is loading...
CNSIX vs PACIX
CNSIX vs PACIX Comparison
Open Charts CNSIX vs PACIX
Invesco Convertible Securities R5
Price$23.08
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets674.01M
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$21.13
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
CNSIX vs PACIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNSIX vs. PACIX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSIX is a Buy and PACIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. CNSIX (674M). CNSIX pays higher dividends than PACIX: CNSIX (2.56) vs PACIX (1.91). CNSIX was incepted earlier than PACIX: CNSIX (14 years) vs PACIX (38 years). PACIX (1.16) is less costly to investors than CNSIX (0.67). CNSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. PACIX (72.00). PACIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNSIX: PACIX (2000) vs CNSIX (1000000). PACIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. CNSIX (7.01). PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 11.21 vs. CNSIX (4.50).
| CNSIX | PACIX | CNSIX / PACIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.947 | -2.741 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 674M | 1.08B | 62% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.56 | 1.91 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 7.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.87 | 0.34 | 1,734% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.50 | 11.21 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.53 | 31.13 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...