It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOSPN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OSPN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.30% price change this week, while OSPN (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.
OSPN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
CNSWF | OSPN | CNSWF / OSPN | |
Capitalization | 44.8B | 442M | 10,136% |
EBITDA | 1.51B | -5.08M | -29,679% |
Gain YTD | 25.298 | 68.097 | 37% |
P/E Ratio | 86.96 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 7.11B | 235M | 3,025% |
Total Cash | 1.01B | 42.5M | 2,376% |
Total Debt | 2.38B | 6.82M | 34,848% |
CNSWF | OSPN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 28 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OSPN's Valuation (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CNSWF (82) in the null industry. This means that OSPN’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for OSPN (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew significantly faster than OSPN’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as OSPN (55) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to OSPN’s over the last 12 months.
OSPN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CNSWF (45) in the null industry. This means that OSPN’s stock grew similarly to CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as OSPN (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to OSPN’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF | OSPN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago49% | 1 day ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 1 day ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago76% | 8 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago59% | 1 day ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CNSWF | 100% | -4.44% | ||
DSGX - CNSWF | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
SAP - CNSWF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.60% | ||
MSFT - CNSWF | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.76% | ||
PDFS - CNSWF | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.14% | ||
PTC - CNSWF | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.10% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OSPN has been loosely correlated with SWI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OSPN jumps, then SWI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OSPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OSPN | 100% | -6.49% | ||
SWI - OSPN | 45% Loosely correlated | -3.34% | ||
UPBD - OSPN | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
DJCO - OSPN | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.51% | ||
LYT - OSPN | 41% Loosely correlated | -12.61% | ||
CNSWF - OSPN | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.44% | ||
More |