Advertisement
CNSWF vs PRTH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNSWF is a Hold and PRTH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNSWF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePRTH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNSWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PRTH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNSWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRTH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNSWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PRTH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNSWF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while PRTH (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNSWF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
PRTH is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.69% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CNSWF | PRTH | CNSWF / PRTH | |
| Capitalization | 44.8B | 244M | 18,361% |
| EBITDA | 1.51B | 152M | 992% |
| Gain YTD | 16.041 | -39.149 | -41% |
| P/E Ratio | 86.96 | 32.36 | 269% |
| Revenue | 7.11B | 756M | 940% |
| Total Cash | 1.01B | 39.6M | 2,551% |
| Total Debt | 2.38B | 639M | 372% |
CNSWF | PRTH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRTH's Valuation (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNSWF (87) in the null industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNSWF’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRTH (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRTH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as PRTH (56) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew similarly to PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
CNSWF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRTH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that CNSWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
| CNSWF | PRTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 13 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 1 day ago 86% |
Advertisement
CNSWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNSWF has been loosely correlated with DSGX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNSWF jumps, then DSGX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNSWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNSWF | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| DSGX - CNSWF | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SAP - CNSWF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| MSFT - CNSWF | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| PDFS - CNSWF | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| PTC - CNSWF | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
PRTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRTH has been loosely correlated with ALIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRTH jumps, then ALIT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRTH | 100% | -1.58% | ||
| ALIT - PRTH | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| BIGC - PRTH | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| SHOP - PRTH | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| BLZE - PRTH | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.36% | ||
| PCTY - PRTH | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||