Advertisement
PRTH vs SHOP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PRTH is a Buy and SHOP is a Hold.
PRTH | SHOP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 55 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PRTH's Valuation (5) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for SHOP (85) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew significantly faster than SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
PRTH's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SHOP (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
SHOP's SMR Rating (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRTH (91) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SHOP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
PRTH's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SHOP (42) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that PRTH’s stock grew similarly to SHOP’s over the last 12 months.
SHOP's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for PRTH (96) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that SHOP’s stock grew significantly faster than PRTH’s over the last 12 months.
| PRTH | SHOP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PRTH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SHOP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PRTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SHOP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PRTH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHOP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PRTH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SHOP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
PRTH (@Computer Communications) experienced а +32.43% price change this week, while SHOP (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
PRTH is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
SHOP is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.51% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-0.19% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
PRTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PRTH has been loosely correlated with ALIT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PRTH jumps, then ALIT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PRTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRTH | 100% | N/A | ||
| ALIT - PRTH | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.87% | ||
| AFRM - PRTH | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.13% | ||
| SHOP - PRTH | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.66% | ||
| XYZ - PRTH | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| CMRC - PRTH | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.86% | ||
More | ||||
SHOP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOP has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SHOP jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOP | 100% | -3.66% | ||
| COIN - SHOP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CLSK - SHOP | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
| RIOT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| FTNT - SHOP | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.57% | ||
| PAYO - SHOP | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||