Advertisement
CNVS vs LVO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNVS is a StrongBuy and LVO is a Hold.
CNVS | LVO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 92 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CNVS's Valuation (53) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LVO (70) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that CNVS’s stock grew similarly to LVO’s over the last 12 months.
CNVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LVO (100) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that CNVS’s stock grew similarly to LVO’s over the last 12 months.
CNVS's SMR Rating (97) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LVO (100) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that CNVS’s stock grew similarly to LVO’s over the last 12 months.
CNVS's Price Growth Rating (83) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LVO (92) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that CNVS’s stock grew similarly to LVO’s over the last 12 months.
CNVS's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LVO (100) in the Commercial Printing Or Forms industry. This means that CNVS’s stock grew similarly to LVO’s over the last 12 months.
| CNVS | LVO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CNVS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LVO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CNVS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LVO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CNVS’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LVO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CNVS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
- LVO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CNVS (@Movies/Entertainment) experienced а -5.69% price change this week, while LVO (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +12.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Movies/Entertainment industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.79%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.57%.
Reported Earning Dates
CNVS is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
LVO is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Movies/Entertainment (-3.14% weekly)Movies/entertainment industry include companies that produce and distribute motion pictures, and companies that operate general entertainment facilities like amusement parks and bowling centers. Some companies in this industry also have professional sports franchises. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., Liberty Media Corp. and Viacom Inc. are some of the biggest companies in this space.
@Internet Software/Services (-2.79% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BFAP | 16.25 | 0.09 | +0.53% |
| FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - April | |||
| BGH | 13.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund | |||
| IWMY | 17.10 | -0.06 | -0.35% |
| Defiance R2000 Weekly Distribution ETF (IWMY) | |||
| JANI | 25.28 | -0.17 | -0.68% |
| AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANI) | |||
| IGRO | 87.91 | -0.85 | -0.96% |
| iShares International Dividend Growth ETF (IGRO) | |||
CNVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CNVS and SPHR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNVS and SPHR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CNVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNVS | 100% | -2.50% | ||
| SPHR - CNVS | 33% Poorly correlated | -4.38% | ||
| MSGE - CNVS | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.07% | ||
| LUCK - CNVS | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.24% | ||
| LLYVK - CNVS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
| LLYVA - CNVS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
LVO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVO has been loosely correlated with PODC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LVO jumps, then PODC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVO | 100% | -0.39% | ||
| PODC - LVO | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| WBTN - LVO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CNVS - LVO | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| TOON - LVO | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.73% | ||
| VIA - LVO | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||