CNVVF
Price
$3.50
Change
-$0.20 (-5.41%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.48B
CSBTF
Price
$34.00
Change
-$1.01 (-2.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
99.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNVVF vs CSBTF

Header iconCNVVF vs CSBTF Comparison
Open Charts CNVVF vs CSBTFBanner chart's image
ConvaTec Group
Price$3.50
Change-$0.20 (-5.41%)
Volume$1.82M
Capitalization5.48B
Kuros Bioscience
Price$34.00
Change-$1.01 (-2.88%)
Volume$850
Capitalization99.14M
CNVVF vs CSBTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNVVF vs. CSBTF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNVVF is a Hold and CSBTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CNVVF: $3.50 vs. CSBTF: $34.00)
Brand notoriety: CNVVF and CSBTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNVVF: 2227% vs. CSBTF: 67%
Market capitalization -- CNVVF: $5.48B vs. CSBTF: $99.14M
CNVVF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $5.48B. CSBTF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $99.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCSBTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CSBTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNVVF is a better buy in the long-term than CSBTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNVVF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSBTF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNVVF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CSBTF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNVVF is a better buy in the short-term than CSBTF.

Price Growth

CNVVF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -11.41% price change this week, while CSBTF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -2.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+1.93% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNVVF($5.48B) has a higher market cap than CSBTF($99.1M). CSBTF YTD gains are higher at: 50.642 vs. CNVVF (21.090). CNVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 356M vs. CSBTF (-8.84M). CNVVF has more cash in the bank: 144M vs. CSBTF (24.1M). CSBTF has less debt than CNVVF: CSBTF (1.91M) vs CNVVF (1.3B). CNVVF has higher revenues than CSBTF: CNVVF (2.07B) vs CSBTF (18M).
CNVVFCSBTFCNVVF / CSBTF
Capitalization5.48B99.1M5,534%
EBITDA356M-8.84M-4,027%
Gain YTD21.09050.64242%
P/E Ratio85.47N/A-
Revenue2.07B18M11,511%
Total Cash144M24.1M598%
Total Debt1.3B1.91M67,956%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNVVF vs CSBTF: Fundamental Ratings
CNVVF
CSBTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7135
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4116
SMR RATING
1..100
9292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CNVVF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSBTF (56). This means that CNVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.

CSBTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CNVVF (41). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CSBTF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as CNVVF (92). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CSBTF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CNVVF (49). This means that CSBTF’s stock grew similarly to CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CNVVF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CSBTF (100). This means that CNVVF’s stock grew similarly to CSBTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNVVFCSBTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CSBTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGAAX72.340.70
+0.98%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R1
IIIAX12.82N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port A
SGIFX38.91N/A
N/A
Steward Global Equity Income Fund C
JFNSX62.59N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences S
HEOTX17.52N/A
N/A
Hartford Climate Opportunities R5

CNVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNVVF has been loosely correlated with FLMNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNVVF jumps, then FLMNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNVVF
1D Price
Change %
CNVVF100%
N/A
FLMNY - CNVVF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SAFLY - CNVVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GKOS - CNVVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
EW - CNVVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
OFIX - CNVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More

CSBTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CSBTF and APYX have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CSBTF and APYX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSBTF
1D Price
Change %
CSBTF100%
-2.88%
APYX - CSBTF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
DIZTF - CSBTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHEOY - CSBTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBF - CSBTF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNVVF - CSBTF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More