CNVVF
Price
$3.48
Change
-$0.02 (-0.57%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
6.35B
FLMNY
Price
$12.86
Change
+$0.34 (+2.72%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.43B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNVVF vs FLMNY

Header iconCNVVF vs FLMNY Comparison
Open Charts CNVVF vs FLMNYBanner chart's image
ConvaTec Group
Price$3.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.57%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization6.35B
Fielmann Group AG
Price$12.86
Change+$0.34 (+2.72%)
Volume$191
Capitalization5.43B
CNVVF vs FLMNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLMNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CNVVF vs. FLMNY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNVVF is a Hold and FLMNY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (CNVVF: $3.35 vs. FLMNY: $12.86)
Brand notoriety: CNVVF and FLMNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNVVF: 0% vs. FLMNY: 31%
Market capitalization -- CNVVF: $6.35B vs. FLMNY: $5.43B
CNVVF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $6.35B. FLMNY’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $5.43B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $172.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNVVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLMNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNVVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLMNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLMNY is a better buy in the long-term than CNVVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNVVF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLMNY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNVVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FLMNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNVVF is a better buy in the short-term than FLMNY.

Price Growth

CNVVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while FLMNY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.53% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNVVF($6.35B) has a higher market cap than FLMNY($5.43B). CNVVF has higher P/E ratio than FLMNY: CNVVF (31.60) vs FLMNY (28.30). FLMNY YTD gains are higher at: 52.066 vs. CNVVF (15.917). CNVVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 567M vs. FLMNY (399M). CNVVF (2.36B) and FLMNY (2.33B) have equivalent revenues.
CNVVFFLMNYCNVVF / FLMNY
Capitalization6.35B5.43B117%
EBITDA567M399M142%
Gain YTD15.91752.06631%
P/E Ratio31.6028.30112%
Revenue2.36B2.33B101%
Total Cash95.7MN/A-
Total Debt1.34BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNVVF vs FLMNY: Fundamental Ratings
CNVVF
FLMNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5091
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5291
SMR RATING
1..100
8451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7946
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLMNY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CNVVF (26). This means that FLMNY’s stock grew similarly to CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

CNVVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLMNY (91). This means that CNVVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLMNY’s over the last 12 months.

FLMNY's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNVVF (84). This means that FLMNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

FLMNY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CNVVF (49). This means that FLMNY’s stock grew similarly to CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

FLMNY's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNVVF (79). This means that FLMNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CNVVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNVVFFLMNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNVVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLMNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CADJPY106.91N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - Japan Yen
PTEC39.66N/A
N/A
Global X PropTech ETF
GOVI27.23-0.12
-0.44%
Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF
PBDC33.45-0.27
-0.80%
Putnam BDC Income ETF
GDXD2.13-0.06
-2.74%
MicroSectors™ Gold Mns 3X Inv Lvrgd ETN

CNVVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNVVF has been loosely correlated with FLMNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CNVVF jumps, then FLMNY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNVVF
1D Price
Change %
CNVVF100%
-3.67%
FLMNY - CNVVF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SAFLY - CNVVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GKOS - CNVVF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.34%
EW - CNVVF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
OFIX - CNVVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
More

FLMNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLMNY has been closely correlated with KSRBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLMNY jumps, then KSRBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLMNY
1D Price
Change %
FLMNY100%
N/A
KSRBF - FLMNY
69%
Closely correlated
N/A
CNVVF - FLMNY
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.67%
BDSX - FLMNY
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
JNDOF - FLMNY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LUDG - FLMNY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More