Ad is loading...
CNWDX vs RNWHX
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWHX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$16.93
Change+$0.20 (+1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.07M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$77.82
Change+$0.84 (+1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.47B
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 61.5B vs. CNWDX (355M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWHX (1.12) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWHX (9 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWHX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). CNWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.50 vs. RNWHX (2.65). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.59 vs. CNWDX (30.78).
| CNWDX | RNWHX | CNWDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.72 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.770 | 2.368 | -201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 355M | 61.5B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.50 | 2.65 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.13 | 13.21 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.78 | 39.59 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...