Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNWDX vs RNWHX
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWHX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$19.25
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets396.32M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$88.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.07B
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 70.1B vs. CNWDX (396M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWHX (0.99) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWHX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. CNWDX (4.51). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 28.90 vs. CNWDX (17.67).
| CNWDX | RNWHX | CNWDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.72 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.632 | 15.930 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 396M | 70.1B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.99 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 9.61 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.77 | 40.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.67 | 28.90 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers