Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CNWDX vs RNWHX
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CNWDX vs RNWHX
Calamos Evolving World Growth C
Price$20.22
Change-$0.18 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets382.87M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.33
Change-$0.96 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.89B
CNWDX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNWDX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNWDX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. CNWDX (383M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CNWDX: RNWHX (0.90) vs CNWDX (0.00). CNWDX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CNWDX (17 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CNWDX (2.40) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CNWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CNWDX: RNWHX (250) vs CNWDX (2500). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.74 vs. CNWDX (14.56). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.86 vs. CNWDX (2.80).
| CNWDX | RNWHX | CNWDX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 0.72 | 285% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.40 | 0.72 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.207 | 24.086 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 383M | 74.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.56 | 19.74 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.12 | 46.09 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.80 | 20.86 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.23 | 88.69 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers