Ad is loading...
CNYA vs MCHI
CNYA vs MCHI Comparison
Open Charts CNYA vs MCHI
iShares MSCI China A ETF
Price$27.28
Change+$0.33 (+1.22%)
Volume$60.78K
Net Assets261.5M
iShares MSCI China ETF
Price$46.21
Change+$0.93 (+2.05%)
Volume$2.63M
Net Assets4.96B
CNYA vs MCHI Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CNYA vs. MCHI commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CNYA is a Hold and MCHI is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCHI has more net assets: 4.96B vs. CNYA (261M). MCHI has a higher annual dividend yield than CNYA: MCHI (-1.387) vs CNYA (-2.222). CNYA was incepted earlier than MCHI: CNYA (9 years) vs MCHI (14 years). CNYA has a higher turnover MCHI (13.00) vs MCHI (13.00).
| CNYA | MCHI | CNYA / MCHI | |
| Gain YTD | -2.222 | -1.387 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 261M | 4.96B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 13.00 | 200% |
| Yield | 4.22 | 3.57 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CNYA | MCHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 77% | 24 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
MCHI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHI has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCHI jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MCHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | 100% | +2.05% | ||
| BABA - MCHI | 87% Closely correlated | +3.26% | ||
| JD - MCHI | 82% Closely correlated | +10.11% | ||
| BILI - MCHI | 81% Closely correlated | +2.89% | ||
| BIDU - MCHI | 77% Closely correlated | +2.71% | ||
| KC - MCHI | 76% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||