Ad is loading...
COAVX vs TRIGX
COAVX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts COAVX vs TRIGX
Columbia Overseas Value A
Price$12.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.84B
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.42B
COAVX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COAVX vs. TRIGX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COAVX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. COAVX (3.84B). COAVX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: COAVX (4.40) vs TRIGX (2.21). COAVX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: COAVX (12 years) vs TRIGX (26 years). COAVX (1.22) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.87). COAVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). COAVX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: COAVX (2000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX (17.48) and COAVX (16.78) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 113.55 vs. COAVX (94.14).
| COAVX | TRIGX | COAVX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.87 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.87 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.619 | 18.776 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.84B | 14.4B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.40 | 2.21 | 199% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.78 | 17.48 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.43 | 55.92 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.14 | 113.55 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.41 | 57.41 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...