Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
COBYX vs FNWFX
COBYX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts COBYX vs FNWFX
The Cook & Bynum
Price$16.66
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.18M
American Funds New World F3
Price$94.08
Change+$0.17 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.99B
COBYX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
COBYX vs. FNWFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COBYX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 73B vs. COBYX (74.2M). COBYX pays higher dividends than FNWFX: COBYX (1.27) vs FNWFX (1.06). COBYX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: COBYX (16 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). COBYX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. COBYX (4.00). COBYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: COBYX (5000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.97 vs. COBYX (1.55). COBYX return over 5 years is better than : 56.55 vs. FNWFX (31.62).
| COBYX | FNWFX | COBYX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 0.57 | 261% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.57 | 346% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.720 | 22.150 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.2M | 73B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.06 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 16.97 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 45.92 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.55 | 31.62 | 179% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.17 | N/A | - |