COCSF
Price
$8.52
Change
+$0.30 (+3.65%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
17.75B
FLWBF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.47M
Interact to see
Advertisement

COCSF vs FLWBF

Header iconCOCSF vs FLWBF Comparison
Open Charts COCSF vs FLWBFBanner chart's image
Coca-Cola FEMSA S.A.B de CV
Price$8.52
Change+$0.30 (+3.65%)
Volume$3.44K
Capitalization17.75B
Flow Beverage
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$25K
Capitalization3.47M
COCSF vs FLWBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLWBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COCSF vs. FLWBF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COCSF is a Hold and FLWBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (COCSF: $8.45 vs. FLWBF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: COCSF and FLWBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COCSF: 100% vs. FLWBF: 204%
Market capitalization -- COCSF: $17.75B vs. FLWBF: $3.47M
COCSF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $17.75B. FLWBF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $3.47M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $302.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $24.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COCSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLWBF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COCSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLWBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COCSF is a better buy in the long-term than FLWBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COCSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLWBF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FLWBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLWBF is a better buy in the short-term than COCSF.

Price Growth

COCSF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while FLWBF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was +17.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +373.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+3.39% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COCSF($17.8B) has a higher market cap than FLWBF($3.47M). COCSF YTD gains are higher at: 12.781 vs. FLWBF (-67.001). COCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 41.5B vs. FLWBF (-18.82M). COCSF has more cash in the bank: 37.1B vs. FLWBF (732K). FLWBF has less debt than COCSF: FLWBF (90.9M) vs COCSF (84.5B). COCSF has higher revenues than FLWBF: COCSF (289B) vs FLWBF (47.1M).
COCSFFLWBFCOCSF / FLWBF
Capitalization17.8B3.47M512,821%
EBITDA41.5B-18.82M-220,488%
Gain YTD12.781-67.001-19%
P/E Ratio14.01N/A-
Revenue289B47.1M613,588%
Total Cash37.1B732K5,068,306%
Total Debt84.5B90.9M92,959%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COCSF: Fundamental Ratings
COCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COCSFFLWBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLWBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKQNY9.68N/A
N/A
Bank of Queensland Ltd.
LLESF3.85N/A
N/A
Lendlease Corporation Limited
OMHLF0.17N/A
N/A
OM Holdings Ltd.
RENI0.11N/A
N/A
Resilient Energy Inc.
AAQL0.65N/A
N/A
Antiaging Quantum Living Inc.

COCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COCSF and OTLY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COCSF and OTLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COCSF
1D Price
Change %
COCSF100%
+3.56%
OTLY - COCSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.32%
YKLTF - COCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NNFSF - COCSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FLWBF - COCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
GUROF - COCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More

FLWBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLWBF and GOGY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLWBF and GOGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWBF
1D Price
Change %
FLWBF100%
-1.25%
GOGY - FLWBF
6%
Poorly correlated
+13.50%
OTLY - FLWBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.32%
ZVIA - FLWBF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.78%
GUROF - FLWBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
COCSF - FLWBF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.56%
More