CODAF
Price
$18.44
Change
-$1.76 (-8.71%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.53B
HXGBY
Price
$11.78
Change
+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
31.45B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CODAF vs HXGBY

Header iconCODAF vs HXGBY Comparison
Open Charts CODAF vs HXGBYBanner chart's image
Codan
Price$18.44
Change-$1.76 (-8.71%)
Volume$500
Capitalization3.53B
Hexagon AB
Price$11.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.43%)
Volume$84.44K
Capitalization31.45B
CODAF vs HXGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CODAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CODAF vs. HXGBY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CODAF is a Hold and HXGBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CODAF: $18.44 vs. HXGBY: $11.78)
Brand notoriety: CODAF and HXGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CODAF: 118% vs. HXGBY: 42%
Market capitalization -- CODAF: $3.53B vs. HXGBY: $31.45B
CODAF [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] is valued at $3.53B. HXGBY’s [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] market capitalization is $31.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry ranges from $89.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Equipment/Instruments] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CODAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHXGBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CODAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HXGBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CODAF is a better buy in the long-term than HXGBY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CODAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HXGBY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CODAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HXGBY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CODAF is a better buy in the short-term than HXGBY.

Price Growth

CODAF (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) experienced а -8.71% price change this week, while HXGBY (@Electronic Equipment/Instruments) price change was -4.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Equipment/Instruments industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

HXGBY is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Equipment/Instruments (-0.46% weekly)

This industry manufactures electronic products used in various critical and sophisticated technologies, including laser-based systems, circuit and continuity testers, electro-optical measuring instruments and high-speed precision weighing and inspection equipment. Some major companies operating in this business are Canon Inc., Keysight Technologies Inc., and Fortive Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HXGBY($31.5B) has a higher market cap than CODAF($3.53B). CODAF has higher P/E ratio than HXGBY: CODAF (49.29) vs HXGBY (28.82). CODAF YTD gains are higher at: 152.603 vs. HXGBY (26.510).
CODAFHXGBYCODAF / HXGBY
Capitalization3.53B31.5B11%
EBITDAN/A1.94B-
Gain YTD152.60326.510576%
P/E Ratio49.2928.82171%
RevenueN/A5.44B-
Total CashN/A576M-
Total DebtN/A4.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CODAF vs HXGBY: Fundamental Ratings
CODAF
HXGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3581
SMR RATING
1..100
5073
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HXGBY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (25). This means that HXGBY’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HXGBY (81). This means that CODAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (73). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.

CODAF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HXGBY (48). This means that CODAF’s stock grew similarly to HXGBY’s over the last 12 months.

HXGBY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CODAF (61). This means that HXGBY’s stock grew similarly to CODAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CODAFHXGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CODAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HXGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RREAX29.450.29
+0.99%
Russell Inv Global Real Estate Secs A
TSRPX20.330.18
+0.89%
Nuveen Quant Small Cap Equity Premier
LCILX28.450.20
+0.71%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders IS
NIQAX14.680.10
+0.69%
Neuberger Berman International Eq A
GGIPX22.620.14
+0.62%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps P

CODAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CODAF and HXGBY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CODAF and HXGBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CODAF
1D Price
Change %
CODAF100%
N/A
HXGBY - CODAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
KYCCF - CODAF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.81%
JELLF - CODAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HRIBF - CODAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAZGF - CODAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HXGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HXGBY has been loosely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HXGBY jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HXGBY
1D Price
Change %
HXGBY100%
+0.43%
NOVT - HXGBY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
MKSI - HXGBY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
FTV - HXGBY
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
KEYS - HXGBY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
TRMB - HXGBY
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More