COF
Price
$204.87
Change
+$4.39 (+2.19%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
126.22B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MA
Price
$489.03
Change
-$5.38 (-1.09%)
Updated
Jun 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
432B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COF vs MA

COF vs MA Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Capital One Financial (COF) vs. Mastercard (MA) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Capital One Financial (COF) has delivered stronger year-to-date performance at 20.43% compared to Mastercard's (MA) 10.79%.
  • MA trades at a more attractive trailing P/E ratio of 30.73 versus COF's elevated 59.11, reflecting superior margins.
  • COF reported Q1 revenue of $15.23 billion and adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $4.42, missing estimates but showing year-over-year growth amid Discover integration.
  • MA maintains global diversification and innovation in AI and crypto payments, with upcoming Q1 earnings anticipated to drive sentiment.
  • Analysts rate both as buys, but COF offers higher implied upside to average targets (~33% vs. ~28% for MA).
  • COF generates higher revenue ($36.31B TTM) but faces greater credit risk, while MA excels in asset-light scalability.

Introduction

Capital One Financial (COF) and Mastercard (MA) represent distinct segments of the financial services sector: COF as a diversified bank with significant lending exposure, and MA as a global payment network processor. This comparison is relevant for traders seeking short-term momentum plays and long-term investors evaluating consumer credit trends against digital payment growth. In the current market environment, marked by interest rate dynamics and technological shifts, understanding their relative performance, valuations, and catalysts aids in assessing portfolio positioning and sector rotation opportunities.

COF Overview and Recent Performance

Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is a major U.S. bank holding company focused on credit cards, consumer banking, and commercial lending, with key operations in digital channels and branches across select states. It holds approximately $683 billion in assets, bolstered by its May 2025 acquisition of Discover Financial Services. In recent market activity, COF shares have exhibited volatility, with year-to-date gains of 20.43% but a pullback following Q1 results that missed revenue and EPS expectations at $15.23 billion and $4.42 adjusted, respectively. Sentiment has been influenced by year-over-year revenue growth, ongoing Discover integration progress, and analyst optimism despite higher net charge-offs (NCOs, losses from uncollectible loans). Trading around $192, the stock reflects resilience amid broader banking sector pressures from consumer debt levels.

MA Overview and Recent Performance

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) operates a technology-driven payment network processing transactions globally across credit, debit, and prepaid products in over 200 countries. With $32.79 billion in trailing twelve-month revenue and high-margin operations, it emphasizes security, analytics, and emerging areas like AI agents and crypto rails. Recent weeks have seen steady price action around $508, with year-to-date returns of 10.79% amid market rotations away from high-growth names. Performance drivers include anticipation for Q1 earnings on April 30, innovations in digital commerce, and resilience despite regulatory scrutiny on fees. Analyst sentiment remains positive, supported by consistent volume growth and cross-border payment expansion.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots optimized for current market conditions, drawn from hundreds of bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. Currently featuring 25 trending robots, these employ AI/ML models in styles like single-agent trend following, multi-agent swing trading, and double-agent approaches on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Performance stats are compelling, with annualized returns ranging from 38% to 128%, win rates of 50-70%, profit factors up to 3.35, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 16 in sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and space. These bots offer real-time signals and risk management for copy trading. Traders can explore this dynamic leaderboard to identify bots aligning with their risk tolerance and market views.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COF and MA diverge in business models: COF as a balance-sheet intensive lender reliant on net interest income (NII, earnings from loans minus deposit costs) and credit card fees, exposing it to NCOs and economic cycles; MA as an asset-light network earning transaction-based fees with superior operating margins over 50%. Growth drivers contrast COF's domestic consumer lending expansion via Discover against MA's international volume surges. Recent momentum favors COF on YTD basis, though both show one-month gains around 3-4%. Risk factors include COF's sensitivity to interest rates and delinquency trends versus MA's regulatory and competitive pressures. Sector exposure tilts COF toward U.S. banking volatility, while MA benefits from fintech tailwinds. Market sentiment is bullish for both, with COF drawing attention for M&A (mergers and acquisitions) synergies.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently favor COF over MA in the near term, citing superior trend consistency with 20%+ YTD gains, catalysts from Discover integration, and greater relative upside to analyst targets amid resilient consumer lending positioning. While MA offers stability through global scale, COF's momentum edges it probabilistically higher for trend-following strategies.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COF vs. MA commentary
Jun 26, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a StrongBuy and MA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2026
Stock price -- (COF: $204.90 vs. MA: $488.92)
Brand notoriety: COF and MA are both notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 93% vs. MA: 93%
Market capitalization -- COF: $126.22B vs. MA: $432B
COF [@Savings Banks] is valued at $126.22B. MA’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $432B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $628.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $31.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, COF is a better buy in the long-term than MA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MA is a better buy in the short-term than COF.

Price Growth

COF (@Savings Banks) experienced а +1.67% price change this week, while MA (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

MA is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (+0.23% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MA($432B) has a higher market cap than COF($126B). COF has higher P/E ratio than MA: COF (61.73) vs MA (28.01). MA YTD gains are higher at: -13.116 vs. COF (-16.607). MA has more cash in the bank: 8.22B vs. COF (3.03B). MA has less debt than COF: MA (19B) vs COF (51.3B). COF has higher revenues than MA: COF (58.7B) vs MA (33.9B).
COFMACOF / MA
Capitalization126B432B29%
EBITDAN/A21.3B-
Gain YTD-16.607-13.116127%
P/E Ratio61.7328.01220%
Revenue58.7B33.9B173%
Total Cash3.03B8.22B37%
Total Debt51.3B19B270%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs MA: Fundamental Ratings
COF
MA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6244
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5460
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
477
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COF's Valuation (92) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MA (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

MA's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that MA’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MA (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

COF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MA (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to MA’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for MA (77) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew significantly faster than MA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFMA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GREE1.630.04
+2.52%
Greenidge Generation Holdings
BHRB67.850.92
+1.37%
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp
MPAA15.010.06
+0.40%
Motorcar Parts of America
APP464.96-2.06
-0.44%
Applovin Corp
INGM27.63-0.70
-2.47%
Ingram Micro Holding Corp

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
+1.35%
SYF - COF
83%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
AXP - COF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
ALLY - COF
74%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
OMF - COF
71%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
BFH - COF
71%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
More

MA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MA has been closely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MA jumps, then V could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MA
1D Price
Change %
MA100%
+1.30%
V - MA
85%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
OBDC - MA
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
AER - MA
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
OCSL - MA
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
R - MA
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.89%
More