COF
Price
$181.20
Change
-$3.91 (-2.11%)
Updated
Dec 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
41 days until earnings call
SLM
Price
$27.82
Change
+$0.14 (+0.51%)
Updated
Dec 18, 11:00 AM (EDT)
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COF vs SLM

Header iconCOF vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts COF vs SLMBanner chart's image
Capital One Financial
Price$181.20
Change-$3.91 (-2.11%)
Volume$15.01K
CapitalizationN/A
SLM
Price$27.82
Change+$0.14 (+0.51%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
COF vs SLM Comparison Chart
Loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COF vs. SLM commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COF is a Hold and SLM is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (COF: $181.18 vs. SLM: $27.68)
Brand notoriety: COF and SLM are both notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COF: 97% vs. SLM: 148%
Market capitalization -- COF: $56.64B vs. SLM: $4.8B
COF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $56.64B. SLM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • COF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the long-term than COF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the short-term than COF.

Price Growth

COF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -1.50% price change this week, while SLM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +5.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

COF is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-2.18% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COF($56.6B) has a higher market cap than SLM($4.8B). COF has higher P/E ratio than SLM: COF (12.16) vs SLM (8.85). SLM YTD gains are higher at: 47.784 vs. COF (40.458). SLM has less debt than COF: SLM (5.23B) vs COF (49.3B). COF has higher revenues than SLM: COF (36.8B) vs SLM (1.81B).
COFSLMCOF / SLM
Capitalization56.6B4.8B1,179%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.45847.78485%
P/E Ratio12.168.85137%
Revenue36.8B1.81B2,034%
Total Cash3.36BN/A-
Total Debt49.3B5.23B943%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COF vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
COF
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6314
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3010
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1643
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (27) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COF (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than COF’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (30) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's SMR Rating (2) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SLM (9) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as COF (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to COF’s over the last 12 months.

COF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SLM (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that COF’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GXC78.160.86
+1.11%
SPDR® S&P China ETF
CTEX21.77N/A
N/A
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
DIVZ32.59-0.16
-0.49%
Opal Dividend Income ETF
FCEF21.77-0.13
-0.59%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
FXR78.19-1.05
-1.33%
First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF

COF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COF
1D Price
Change %
COF100%
-2.12%
SYF - COF
84%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
OMF - COF
69%
Closely correlated
-3.50%
SLM - COF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
ENVA - COF
67%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
BFH - COF
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More

SLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLM has been closely correlated with NAVI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLM jumps, then NAVI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLM
1D Price
Change %
SLM100%
-0.25%
NAVI - SLM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
SYF - SLM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.98%
ENVA - SLM
68%
Closely correlated
-2.49%
COF - SLM
67%
Closely correlated
-2.12%
DFS - SLM
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More