COFS
Price
$31.67
Change
-$0.15 (-0.47%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Capitalization
206.57M
54 days until earnings call
EFSC
Price
$58.56
Change
+$0.59 (+1.02%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COFS vs EFSC

Header iconCOFS vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs EFSCBanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$31.67
Change-$0.15 (-0.47%)
Volume$21.49K
Capitalization206.57M
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$58.56
Change+$0.59 (+1.02%)
Volume$281.88K
Capitalization1.47B
COFS vs EFSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COFS vs. EFSC commentary
Feb 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a StrongBuy and EFSC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 28, 2025
Stock price -- (COFS: $31.72 vs. EFSC: $58.56)
Brand notoriety: COFS and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 78% vs. EFSC: 179%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $206.57M vs. EFSC: $1.47B
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $206.57M. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than COFS.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than COFS($207M). COFS has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: COFS (9.50) vs EFSC (7.73). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 3.830 vs. COFS (-10.999). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. COFS (144M). EFSC has less debt than COFS: EFSC (204M) vs COFS (236M). EFSC has higher revenues than COFS: EFSC (550M) vs COFS (80.8M).
COFSEFSCCOFS / EFSC
Capitalization207M1.47B14%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.9993.830-287%
P/E Ratio9.507.73123%
Revenue80.8M550M15%
Total Cash144M193M75%
Total Debt236M204M116%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5936
SMR RATING
1..100
3812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4314
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COFS's Valuation (52) in the null industry is in the same range as EFSC (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (59) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (38) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (58) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (43) in the null industry. This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTPPX13.86N/A
N/A
Principal International Equity R5
SCPIX48.75N/A
N/A
DWS S&P 500 Index S
BUFBX21.22N/A
N/A
Buffalo Flexible Allocation
VKSGX10.45N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value R6
DFRSX17.21-0.13
-0.75%
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company I

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been loosely correlated with CFFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then CFFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
-0.31%
CFFN - COFS
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
EFSC - COFS
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
FIBK - COFS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
HTB - COFS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
BHRB - COFS
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
More

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.02%
NWBI - EFSC
86%
Closely correlated
+0.24%
PRK - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.02%
BUSE - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
ASB - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
CCNE - EFSC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More