COFS
Price
$31.84
Change
+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
FRBA
Price
$15.79
Change
+$0.19 (+1.22%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

COFS vs FRBA

Header iconCOFS vs FRBA Comparison
Open Charts COFS vs FRBABanner chart's image
ChoiceOne Financial Services
Price$31.84
Change+$0.41 (+1.30%)
Volume$37.91K
CapitalizationN/A
First Bank
Price$15.79
Change+$0.19 (+1.22%)
Volume$20.47K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
COFS vs FRBA Comparison Chart
Loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FRBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
COFS vs. FRBA commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COFS is a Sell and FRBA is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (COFS: $31.84 vs. FRBA: $15.79)
Brand notoriety: COFS and FRBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COFS: 100% vs. FRBA: 51%
Market capitalization -- COFS: $206.57M vs. FRBA: $330.07M
COFS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $206.57M. FRBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $330.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COFS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRBA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • COFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRBA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRBA is a better buy in the long-term than COFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRBA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRBA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRBA is a better buy in the short-term than COFS.

Price Growth

COFS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.15% price change this week, while FRBA (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

COFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

FRBA is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBA($330M) has a higher market cap than COFS($207M). FRBA has higher P/E ratio than COFS: FRBA (13.84) vs COFS (9.50). COFS YTD gains are higher at: 11.937 vs. FRBA (8.874). COFS has more cash in the bank: 144M vs. FRBA (23.4M). FRBA (234M) and COFS (236M) have identical debt. FRBA has higher revenues than COFS: FRBA (104M) vs COFS (80.8M).
COFSFRBACOFS / FRBA
Capitalization207M330M63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.9378.874135%
P/E Ratio9.5013.8469%
Revenue80.8M104M78%
Total Cash144M23.4M615%
Total Debt236M234M101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COFS vs FRBA: Fundamental Ratings
COFS
FRBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5668
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5243
SMR RATING
1..100
3929
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRBA's Valuation (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (64) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (52) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's SMR Rating (29) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (39) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

COFS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FRBA (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that COFS’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as COFS (20) in the null industry. This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to COFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COFSFRBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
COFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
FRBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

COFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COFS has been loosely correlated with OBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COFS jumps, then OBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COFS
1D Price
Change %
COFS100%
+1.30%
OBK - COFS
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
FRBA - COFS
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
VABK - COFS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
CFFN - COFS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.16%
HTBI - COFS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More

FRBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRBA has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRBA jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRBA
1D Price
Change %
FRBA100%
+1.22%
GSBC - FRBA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
FFBC - FRBA
79%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
TRST - FRBA
79%
Closely correlated
+0.32%
THFF - FRBA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
WSBC - FRBA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
More