COGZF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.02 (+2.38%)
Updated
Jun 3 closing price
Capitalization
160.91M
LYFT
Price
$15.26
Change
-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COGZF vs LYFT

Header iconCOGZF vs LYFT Comparison
Open Charts COGZF vs LYFTBanner chart's image
Cogstate
Price$0.86
Change+$0.02 (+2.38%)
Volume$581
Capitalization160.91M
Lyft
Price$15.26
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
Volume$10.14M
Capitalization7.74B
COGZF vs LYFT Comparison Chart
Loading...
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COGZF vs. LYFT commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COGZF is a Hold and LYFT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (COGZF: $0.86 vs. LYFT: $15.26)
Brand notoriety: COGZF: Not notable vs. LYFT: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COGZF: 8% vs. LYFT: 56%
Market capitalization -- COGZF: $160.91M vs. LYFT: $7.74B
COGZF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $160.91M. LYFT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $7.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COGZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLYFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LYFT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, COGZF is a better buy in the long-term than LYFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LYFT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LYFT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

COGZF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while LYFT (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.11% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYFT($7.74B) has a higher market cap than COGZF($161M). COGZF YTD gains are higher at: 38.272 vs. LYFT (18.295). COGZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.13M vs. LYFT (-188.97M). LYFT has more cash in the bank: 1.69B vs. COGZF (30.6M). COGZF has less debt than LYFT: COGZF (1.41M) vs LYFT (1.04B). LYFT has higher revenues than COGZF: LYFT (4.4B) vs COGZF (41.4M).
COGZFLYFTCOGZF / LYFT
Capitalization161M7.74B2%
EBITDA7.13M-188.97M-4%
Gain YTD38.27218.295209%
P/E Ratio47.17N/A-
Revenue41.4M4.4B1%
Total Cash30.6M1.69B2%
Total Debt1.41M1.04B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COGZF vs LYFT: Fundamental Ratings
COGZF
LYFT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3771
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62100
SMR RATING
1..100
5774
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7297
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

COGZF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as LYFT (76) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

COGZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LYFT (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

COGZF's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as LYFT (74) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

LYFT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as COGZF (47) in the null industry. This means that LYFT’s stock grew similarly to COGZF’s over the last 12 months.

COGZF's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as LYFT (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that COGZF’s stock grew similarly to LYFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LYFT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LYFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEUR66.290.43
+0.65%
iShares Core MSCI Europe ETF
BCD33.180.05
+0.15%
abrdn Blmb AllCmdLDSK1Fr ETF
FAPR41.45-0.02
-0.06%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Apr
PSCF52.23-0.42
-0.79%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
USAI39.78-0.45
-1.12%
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF

COGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that COGZF and PRCH have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that COGZF and PRCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COGZF
1D Price
Change %
COGZF100%
N/A
PRCH - COGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
IMXI - COGZF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYFT - COGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
CIOXY - COGZF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELWS - COGZF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More