COIN
Price
$272.82
Change
+$7.85 (+2.96%)
Updated
Nov 28, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.45B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLYS
Price
$140.85
Change
-$0.78 (-0.55%)
Updated
Nov 28, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.05B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COIN vs QLYS

Header iconCOIN vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts COIN vs QLYSBanner chart's image
Coinbase Global
Price$272.82
Change+$7.85 (+2.96%)
Volume$525.81K
Capitalization71.45B
Qualys
Price$140.85
Change-$0.78 (-0.55%)
Volume$29.01K
Capitalization5.05B
COIN vs QLYS Comparison Chart in %
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COIN vs. QLYS commentary
Nov 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a StrongBuy and QLYS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 29, 2025
Stock price -- (COIN: $264.97 vs. QLYS: $141.63)
Brand notoriety: COIN and QLYS are both not notable
COIN represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while QLYS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COIN: 100% vs. QLYS: 67%
Market capitalization -- COIN: $71.45B vs. QLYS: $5.05B
COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $71.45B. QLYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $5.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $151.05B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.66T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $29.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $25.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than COIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COIN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both COIN and QLYS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.98% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.30%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

COIN is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.70% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Computer Communications (+3.07% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($71.4B) has a higher market cap than QLYS($5.05B). QLYS has higher P/E ratio than COIN: QLYS (27.30) vs COIN (23.58). COIN YTD gains are higher at: 6.714 vs. QLYS (1.006). COIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.14B vs. QLYS (214M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 13.3B vs. QLYS (370M). QLYS has less debt than COIN: QLYS (55.3M) vs COIN (7.37B). COIN has higher revenues than QLYS: COIN (7.67B) vs QLYS (637M).
COINQLYSCOIN / QLYS
Capitalization71.4B5.05B1,414%
EBITDA4.14B214M1,934%
Gain YTD6.7141.006668%
P/E Ratio23.5827.3086%
Revenue7.67B637M1,204%
Total Cash13.3B370M3,595%
Total Debt7.37B55.3M13,331%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
91
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
62
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
68
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COINQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLYS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SFYX16.130.14
+0.88%
SoFi Next 500 ETF
XMAG22.460.18
+0.82%
Defiance Large Cap ex-Mag 7 ETF
DBEU47.560.32
+0.68%
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Hedged Equity ETF
PYLD26.930.05
+0.19%
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active ETF
HYI11.140.02
+0.18%
Western Asset High Yield Opportunity Fund Inc

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TDC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
-0.11%
TDC - QLYS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.84%
TENB - QLYS
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
DJCO - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.97%
PCTY - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
ADSK - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
More